I’ve
had a request to write about Miranda Warnings (also called your Miranda Rights)
and, looking back on the time that I’ve been blogging, I have no idea why I
haven’t done a post about the Miranda Warnings yet. It’s an area of law that is very
misunderstood by the public and I’d like to clarify the issues for the 3 of you
who read this blog.
Recently,
Miranda was a hot topic because of the Boston bombing and the detention of
suspects therein – people were confused as to why the police wouldn’t have to
give Miranda Warnings up front, and why they would want to wait.
Every
TV show since Dragnet has taught Americans that police have to read you your
rights as soon as you get arrested. That’s
not exactly true.
I
suppose it’s prudent to start at the beginning, so let’s talk a little bit
about what Miranda is.
Miranda v. Arizona
is the case where the “Miranda Warning” rule was created by the United States
Supreme Court. Some laws are made by
congress, some laws are made by courts, some laws are made by local governing
entities and some are made by international treaty…the list of law origins goes
on. I’m sure there’s a SchoolHouse Rock
about it somewhere on YouTube. Anyway, the
law on Miranda Warnings is a creature of caselaw. That’s what lawyers call it when a law is
made by case (because we are not creative).
And Miranda Warnings are named after Miranda
v. Arizona, the case that established that particular rule of law (again,
because we are not creative).
Basically,
the law says that when police take you into custody (for the purpose of this
post only, we will say that “custody” is the same as saying “arrested”) the
officer has to explain your rights to you before
they question you.
So
what are your rights? Well, at a bare
minimum, the police should advise a suspect in custody that they have the right
to remain silent, anything they say can be used against them in court, they
have the right to an attorney, and if they cannot afford an attorney, an
attorney will be provided for them.
“But
Greg!?” Says recently arrested
individual learning about Miranda Rights over a disreputable internet blog. “They didn’t read me my rights when I was
arrested! Can you get the case thrown
out!?”
The
answer is maybe, but not on those facts alone.
The ramification for a failure to read a suspect their Miranda Rights is
that any evidence gleaned as a result of custodial interrogation will not be
admissible in court. So, no. You don’t automatically just go free.
If
the police question you BEFORE they take you into custody (as they frequently
do), they do NOT have to read you Miranda Rights. Let’s say Officer Bob is walking down the
street and smells a strange chemical smell coming from an alley. He walks down the alley and sees a couple of
ruffians up to no good. Officer Bob asks,
“What are you two doing back here?” “Smokin’
Meth!” they reply. “Well, then – you’re
under arrest.” Officer Bob never reads
the boys their Miranda Rights.
In
the preceding scenario, Officer Bob didn’t read the boys their Miranda
Rights. But Miranda v. Arizona wouldn’t preclude the statement “Smokin’ Meth!”
from coming into evidence because the boys were not in custody at the time of
questioning. In fact, they were free to
leave and did not have to speak to the police officer at the time they were
questioned. If they had shut their meth
mouths, they may not have gotten arrested at all.
So
– If you are 1) In custody, and 2) The police are going to question you, then
the police have to read you your Miranda Rights.
These
days, the police often go a step further, and have a custodial suspect sign a
waiver of their Miranda Rights. That way
they have tangible evidence that the suspect was informed, and either waived or
did not waive their right to remain silent/right to counsel.
That
about does it for today. Next time you
watch Dragnet, and Friday reads Miranda, you can quote this entire blog post to
your friends. Seriously, nothing will
make you look cooler.
If
you have any other questions about Miranda Warnings, or your rights in general,
you should call me. 502.618.4949, or you
can email me at greg@attorneysimms.com.
do have to read your rights if you are taken in to custody for shoplifting
ReplyDelete