Attorney Greg Simms is a Louisville Criminal Defense Lawyer at MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, PLC. For representation, call him at 502.473.6464. An initial consultation is free. This blog is for entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice. It does not create an Attorney/Client relationship. Read the "Introduction" post before reading any other blog posts.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Free in Kentucky: Heroin Possession in Kentucky: Penalties, etc.
Free in Kentucky: Heroin Possession in Kentucky: Penalties, etc.: Heroin is back. I’m not sure why, but it’s back. In a big way. I wish I could give you some statistics regarding how many more cases...
Heroin Possession in Kentucky: Penalties, etc.
Heroin is back.
I’m not sure why, but it’s
back. In a big way. I wish I could give you some statistics
regarding how many more cases of heroin possession have made their way through
Kentucky courthouses than, say, five years ago – but I don’t have that
information. All I can tell you is that
five years ago I saw very few heroin cases, and over the past 12 months, heroin
possession has become a lot more prevalent.
Heroin is a Schedule I narcotic,
pursuant to KRS 218A.050(2), which defines all Opium derivatives as such. Schedule I is the classification for the most
dangerous drugs, those which are considered to have a high potential for abuse
and are generally without medicinal value.
This criteria for classification is enumerated in KRS 218A.040 (and, if
I can recall correctly, it is borrowed from the language in federal statutes
for drug classification).
Possession of a Schedule I narcotic,
like heroin, is a pretty serious deal in Kentucky. The name of the crime is Possession of a
Controlled Substance in the First Degree (known in the legal community as POCS 1–
pronounced “pocks first”). It is a class
D felony, carrying a penalty of 1-3 years.
Typically, a class D felony
carries a penalty of 1-5 years, but fortunately for everyone who likes a hit of
laudanum when the headaches start, house bill 463 (HB 463) came through
Kentucky like a tornado of common sense and eased some of the penalties for
non-violent, victimless drug possession.
Guess what else is a Schedule I
narcotic.
Ok, seriously, we’re not going to
play this game if you’re not going to guess.
It’s marijuana. Marijuana is a schedule I narcotic in
Kentucky (and in many other places). “But
Greg!?” you ask, “Didn’t you say that the criteria for schedule I narcotics
includes 1) the high potential for abuse and 2) a lack of medicinal value?” That’s a phenomenal question and I’m glad you
asked it. The answer is yes, and it
appears that Kentucky legislators are completely ignoring the AMA, and
countless doctors that have unequivocally stated that marijuana does have
medicinal value. Further, the fact that
marijuana is not physically addictive seems to be ignored, regarding the “high
potential for abuse” issue.
That does NOT mean that
possession of marijuana counts as POCS 1.
There is a more specific statute governing marijuana possession, and
whenever a general statute and a more specific statute conflict, you are
supposed to rely on the more specific statute.
For more on marijuana, see my post “How Much Marijuana is Too Much
Marijuana?”
We got a little off track today,
because today’s post was supposed to be about heroin. Sorry about that. I just wanted to show you that your
government thinks heroin and marijuana should be classified in the same
category. Which is asinine.
Long story short – heroin is back
and possession of heroin can get you in a lot of trouble.
If you have been charged with
Possession of a Controlled Substance in the First Degree, you should have a
lawyer that knows the law and fights for your rights. Don’t get a lawyer who “dabbles” in drug
possession law. Get an experienced
Louisville drug possession lawyer. Call
502.618.4949 for a free consultation.
Ask for Greg Simms.
Simms & Reed, PLLC. Individual Attention. Extraordinary Results.
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Free in Kentucky: Louisville Detective Shoots Unarmed Man in Street
Free in Kentucky: Louisville Detective Shoots Unarmed Man in Street: Not all police officers are bad. I promise. Most are upstanding servants of the community, actually. I see a lot of cops and I cross ex...
Louisville Detective Shoots Unarmed Man in Street
Not all police officers are bad. I promise. Most are upstanding servants of the community, actually. I see a lot of cops and I cross examine the best and the worst of
them.
Then I sue the worst of them for
false arrest and police brutality.
Speaking of which, a Louisville Metro
Police Detective shot an unarmed man Tuesday night right in the middle of the
damn street. Everybody take a guess now
as to whether the Detective has been arrested for Attempted Murder. Also guess whether the Louisville Metro
Police Department is taking any responsibility.
Let’s see how you do…
Per WLKY: “A
veteran police officer is on administrative leave (which happens after
every officer shooting, justified or not) after
shooting an unarmed man in the street.
WLKY has learned the officer has been disciplined by the department before.
The shooting happened near 24th
and Chestnut streets late Tuesday night.
A neighbor heard the single shot
fired and ran outside.
"I looked again and I saw
this guy standing there with a gun on him," said a neighbor. The man with the gun was Detective Chauncey
Carthan, who has worked for LMPD since 2001.
Police say Carthan was off duty
when he got into an argument with another man and it quickly escalated.
‘At some point, both the officer
as well as the individual exited their vehicles, at which time the officer did
identify himself. However, the subject, or rather the individual, did not
comply with the officer, leaving him to draw his weapon and discharge it one
time,’ said LMPD spokewoman Alicia Smiley.
Other officers arrived on the scene, surrounded Carthan and
surrendered his weapon. The man he shot
was taken to the hospital and is expected to survive.”
Apparently there are no charges yet against Carthan. So if you guessed “No.” to the first question
posed, congratulations!
Let’s see if LMPD is taking any responsibility…
LMPD seems to know something is wrong with this situation
because they seem to be distancing themselves from Detective Carthan. Specifically, they made it a point to say
that he was “off duty.” I would guess
they’re doing this to set themselves up for a defense in any law suit that will
follow (and if the gunshot victim calls me, that law suit will happen very
quickly). What they want everyone to
know is: Detective Carthan shot that guy outside the scope of his employment.
But that might not work very well. Because LMPD wants the best of both worlds
here. Instead of just distancing
themselves from Carthan, they also made the statement that the “subject, or
rather the individual, did not comply with the officer” which I laughed out
loud at. First, the spokeswoman for LMPD
accidentally called the gunshot victim a “subject” which is akin to “person we
suspected of committing some sort of crime.” and then she stated that the
gunshot victim did not “comply” with the Detective. That means that the Detective would have been
acting as a police officer and giving some sort of official instruction that
the gunshot victim would have to follow – but didn’t follow.
I'm not saying the gunshot victim didn't do anything wrong, but we certainly don't have any evidence of any wrongdoing at this time. And he was UNARMED. So whatever he may be accused of doing, it probably didn't justify a gun shot.
If this off duty Detective really did shoot an unarmed man in
the street, there needs to be an investigation into the possible CRIMINAL
CONDUCT of the Detective. Make no
mistake about it, blog reader – if you or I had shot an unarmed man in the street, we would
be in handcuffs right now. By not taking
responsibility and not arresting Carthan, LMPD may only be increasing the
damages in the subsequent law suit.
As I hear more on this story, I will keep you updated.
If you or someone you know has been shot by the police in the
street, and you were unarmed, you should call a lawyer immediately. It isn’t easy to find a Louisville police
brutality lawyer. A lot of attorneys
will not take these kind of cases because they are difficult, and require a lot
of work. You deserve to have a lawyer on your side who cares about your case.
You deserve a lawyer who isn’t afraid of the work that needs to be put
into your case. Call 502.618.4949 and
ask for Greg Simms.
Simms & Reed, PLLC.
Individual Attention.
Extraordinary Results.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)