tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944119633803642164.post8022704073131273688..comments2024-01-20T18:14:26.238-08:00Comments on Free in Kentucky: Angry About Casey Anthony? This Might Explain Why Some Juries Do What They Do.Greg Simms, Louisville DUI Lawyerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04565407249500786237noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944119633803642164.post-31451517128605882872018-07-31T15:59:16.119-07:002018-07-31T15:59:16.119-07:00Want To Increase Your ClickBank Traffic And Commis...<b>Want To Increase Your ClickBank Traffic And Commissions?</b><br /><br /><a href="http://www.bannerizer.com" rel="nofollow"><b>Bannerizer</b></a> makes it easy for you to promote ClickBank products by banners, simply go to <b>Bannerizer</b>, and grab the banner codes for your picked ClickBank products or use the <b>Universal ClickBank Banner Rotator</b> to promote all of the ClickBank products.Bloggerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07287821785570247118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944119633803642164.post-7522275234734674122011-07-27T05:22:03.641-07:002011-07-27T05:22:03.641-07:00The jury should be allowed to hear all the possibl...The jury should be allowed to hear all the possible information. The layer should be allowed to present his views on the information.<br /><br />The jury is being asked to make the call, and yet the information is being filtered. If you can trust them to make the call, you should trust them with the ALL the information. The exaggerations, the lies, the "creative possibilities" are all there from witnesses anyway and the jury has to decide who is stating the truth. Why filter there information. Let them hear it ALL. No the jury is not to blame, it is the legal system, which is to blame. OJ Simson would agree.3TEngineeringhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05233439762946530573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944119633803642164.post-15286083829361724302011-07-06T07:41:28.881-07:002011-07-06T07:41:28.881-07:00My father once served on the Grand Jury. A guy tha...My father once served on the Grand Jury. A guy that my father believed was likely guilty of murder was not indicted partly because my father took his civic duty very seriously. This may be more of a paraphrase than a direct quote but it's pretty damn close. "I felt like the little m***er f***er probably did it, but the evidence just wasn't there to indict." My father, like myself, may be rough around the edges but he was right. Good job Greg.Dizzle77https://www.blogger.com/profile/17855160785601231393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944119633803642164.post-26199697401494060612011-07-06T05:39:47.530-07:002011-07-06T05:39:47.530-07:00I am amused that people who have watched a few new...I am amused that people who have watched a few news highlights and read a couple blogs on the subject want to call the jury stupid for acquitting Anthony. If these 12 people spent over a month sitting in the courtroom hearing all the evidence then deliberating for nine (9) hours and then found Anthony not guilty, I can live with that.Aaron Murphyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08647114045698301180noreply@blogger.com